@article {1366, title = {Mass Azithromycin Distribution to Prevent Child Mortality in Burkina Faso: The CHAT Randomized Clinical Trial.}, journal = {JAMA}, volume = {331}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Feb 13}, pages = {482-490}, abstract = {

IMPORTANCE: Repeated mass distribution of azithromycin has been shown to reduce childhood mortality by 14\% in sub-Saharan Africa. However, the estimated effect varied by location, suggesting that the intervention may not be effective in different geographical areas, time periods, or conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of twice-yearly azithromycin to reduce mortality in children in the presence of seasonal malaria chemoprevention.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of single-dose azithromycin for prevention of all-cause childhood mortality included 341 communities in the Nouna district in rural northwestern Burkina Faso. Participants were children aged 1 to 59 months living in the study communities.

INTERVENTIONS: Communities were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral azithromycin or placebo distribution. Children aged 1 to 59 months were offered single-dose treatment twice yearly for 3 years (6 distributions) from August 2019 to February 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was all-cause childhood mortality, measured during a twice-yearly enumerative census.

RESULTS: A total of 34 399 children (mean [SD] age, 25.2 [18] months) in the azithromycin group and 33 847 children (mean [SD] age, 25.6 [18] months) in the placebo group were included. A mean (SD) of 90.1\% (16.0\%) of the censused children received the scheduled study drug in the azithromycin group and 89.8\% (17.1\%) received the scheduled study drug in the placebo group. In the azithromycin group, 498 deaths were recorded over 60 592 person-years (8.2 deaths/1000 person-years). In the placebo group, 588 deaths were recorded over 58 547 person-years (10.0 deaths/1000 person-years). The incidence rate ratio for mortality was 0.82 (95\% CI, 0.67-1.02; P = .07) in the azithromycin group compared with the placebo group. The incidence rate ratio was 0.99 (95\% CI, 0.72-1.36) in those aged 1 to 11 months, 0.92 (95\% CI, 0.67-1.27) in those aged 12 to 23 months, and 0.73 (95\% CI, 0.57-0.94) in those aged 24 to 59 months.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Mortality in children (aged 1-59 months) was lower with biannual mass azithromycin distribution in a setting in which seasonal malaria chemoprevention was also being distributed, but the difference was not statistically significant. The study may have been underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03676764.

}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2023.27393}, author = {Oldenburg, Catherine E and Ouattara, Mamadou and Bountogo, Mamadou and Boudo, Valentin and Ouedraogo, Thierry and Compaor{\'e}, Guillaume and Dah, Clarisse and Zakane, Alphonse and Coulibaly, Boubacar and Bagagnan, Cheik and Hu, Huiyu and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Kieran S and Nyatigo, Fanice and Keenan, Jeremy D and Doan, Thuy and Porco, Travis C and Arnold, Benjamin F and Lebas, Elodie and Sie, Ali and Lietman, Thomas M} } @article {1156, title = {Gut Microbiome among Children with Uncomplicated Severe Acute Malnutrition in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Azithromycin versus Amoxicillin.}, journal = {Am J Trop Med Hyg}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Dec 12}, abstract = {

Antibiotics are routinely used as part of the management of severe acute malnutrition and are known to reduce gut microbial diversity in non-malnourished children. We evaluated gut microbiomes in children participating in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of azithromycin versus amoxicillin for severe acute malnutrition. Three hundred one children aged 6 to 59 months with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (mid-upper arm circumference \< 11.5 cm and/or weight-for-height Z-score \< -3 without clinical complications) were enrolled in a 1:1 RCT of single-dose azithromycin versus a 7-day course of amoxicillin (standard of care). Of these, 109 children were randomly selected for microbiome evaluation at baseline and 8 weeks. Rectal swabs were processed with metagenomic DNA sequencing. We compared alpha diversity (inverse Simpson{\textquoteright}s index) at 8 weeks and evaluated relative abundance of microbial taxa using DESeq2. Of 109 children enrolled in the microbiome study, 95 were followed at 8 weeks. We found no evidence of a difference in alpha diversity between the azithromycin and amoxicillin groups at 8 weeks controlling for baseline diversity (mean difference -0.6, 95\% CI -1.8 to 0.6, P = 0.30). Gut microbiomes did not diversify during the study. Differentially abundant genera at the P \< 0.01 level included Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., both of which were overabundant in the azithromycin compared with amoxicillin groups. We found no evidence to support an overall difference in gut microbiome diversity between azithromycin and amoxicillin among children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition, but potentially pathogenic bacteria that can cause invasive diarrhea were more common in the azithromycin group. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03568643.

}, issn = {1476-1645}, doi = {10.4269/ajtmh.22-0381}, author = {Oldenburg, Catherine E and Hinterwirth, Armin and Dah, Clarisse and Millogo, Ourohir{\'e} and Coulibaly, Boubacar and Ou{\'e}draogo, Moussa and Sie, Ali and Chen, Cindi and Zhong, Lina and Ruder, Kevin and Lebas, Elodie and Nyatigo, Fanice and Arnold, Benjamin F and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Kieran S and Doan, Thuy} } @article {1031, title = {Gut Resistome after Antibiotics among Children with Uncomplicated Severe Acute Malnutrition: A Randomized Controlled Trial.}, journal = {Am J Trop Med Hyg}, volume = {107}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Jul 13}, pages = {59-64}, abstract = {

A broad-spectrum antibiotic, typically amoxicillin, is included in many country guidelines as part of the management of uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in children without overt clinical symptoms of infection. Alternative antibiotics may be beneficial for children with SAM without increasing selection for beta-lactam resistance. We conducted a 1:1 randomized controlled trial of single dose azithromycin versus a 7-day course of amoxicillin for SAM. Children 6-59 months of age with uncomplicated SAM (mid-upper arm circumference \< 11.5 cm and/or weight-for-height Z-score \< -3) were enrolled in Boromo District, Burkina Faso, from June through October 2020. Rectal swabs were collected at baseline and 8 weeks after treatment and processed using DNA-Seq. We compared the resistome at the class level in children randomized to azithromycin compared with amoxicillin. We found no evidence of a difference in the distribution of genetic antibiotic resistance determinants to any antibiotic class 8 weeks after treatment. There was no difference in genetic macrolide resistance determinants (65\% azithromycin, 65\% placebo, odds ratio, OR, 1.00, 95\% confidence interval, CI, 0.43-2.34) or beta-lactam resistance determinants (82\% azithromycin, 83\% amoxicillin, OR 0.94, 95\% CI, 0.33-2.68) at 8 weeks. Although presence of genetic antibiotic resistance determinants to macrolides and beta-lactams was common, we found no evidence of a difference in the gut resistome 8 weeks after treatment. If there are earlier effects of antibiotics on selection for genetic antibiotic resistance determinants, the resistome may normalize by 8 weeks.

}, keywords = {Amoxicillin, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Child, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Humans, Macrolides, Severe Acute Malnutrition}, issn = {1476-1645}, doi = {10.4269/ajtmh.22-0007}, author = {Oldenburg, Catherine E and Hinterwirth, Armin and Ourohir{\'e}, Millogo and Dah, Clarisse and Ou{\'e}draogo, Moussa and Sie, Ali and Boudo, Valentin and Chen, Cindi and Ruder, Kevin and Zhong, Lina and Lebas, Elodie and Nyatigo, Fanice and Arnold, Benjamin F and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Kieran S and Doan, Thuy} } @article {1006, title = {Neonatal azithromycin administration for prevention of infant mortality.}, journal = {NEJM Evid}, volume = {1}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Apr}, pages = {EVIDoa2100054}, abstract = {

Background: Biannual mass azithromycin administration reduces all-cause childhood mortality in some sub-Saharan African settings, with the largest effects in children aged 1-5 months. Azithromycin has not been distributed to children \<1 month due to risk of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS).

Methods: This 1:1 placebo-controlled trial, randomized neonates aged 8-27 days to a single oral dose of azithromycin (20 mg/kg) or equivalent volume of placebo in 5 regions of Burkina Faso during 2019 and 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6 months of age. Infants were evaluated at 21 days after treatment and at 3 and 6 months of age for vital status; family and provider surveillance for IHPS continued throughout.

Results: Of 21,832 enrolled neonates, 10,898 were allocated to azithromycin and 10,934 to placebo. At 6 months of age, 92 infants had died, 42 (0.44\%) in the azithromycin group and 50 (0.52\%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.85, 95\% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.28, =0.46). A single IHPS case was detected, which was in the azithromycin arm. Serious adverse events, including death and hospitalization within 28 days of treatment, occurred in 0.27\% of infants in the azithromycin group and 0.14\% in the placebo group, for an absolute risk difference 0.14 percentage points, 95\% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.26.

Conclusions: Overall mortality was lower than anticipated when the trial was designed, thus limiting its power. The available data do not support the routine use of azithromycin for prevention of mortality in neonates in sub-Saharan African settings similar to the one in which this trial was conducted.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03682653.

}, issn = {2766-5526}, doi = {10.1056/EVIDoa2100054}, author = {Oldenburg, Catherine E and Sie, Ali and Bountogo, Mamadou and Zakane, Alphonse and Compaor{\'e}, Guillaume and Ouedraogo, Thierry and Koueta, Fla and Lebas, Elodie and Brogdon, Jessica and Nyatigo, Fanice and Doan, Thuy and Porco, Travis C and Arnold, Benjamin F and Lietman, Thomas M} } @article {851, title = {Effect of Oral Azithromycin vs Placebo on COVID-19 Symptoms in Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.}, journal = {JAMA}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Jul 16}, abstract = {

Importance: Azithromycin has been hypothesized to have activity against SARS-CoV-2.

Objective: To determine whether oral azithromycin in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to absence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms at day 14.

Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial of azithromycin vs matching placebo conducted from May 2020 through March 2021. Outpatients from the US were enrolled remotely via internet-based surveys and followed up for 21 days. Eligible participants had a positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test result (nucleic acid amplification or antigen) within 7 days prior to enrollment, were aged 18 years or older, and were not hospitalized at the time of enrollment. Among 604 individuals screened, 297 were ineligible, 44 refused participation, and 263 were enrolled. Participants, investigators, and study staff were masked to treatment randomization.

Interventions: Participants were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to a single oral 1.2-g dose of azithromycin (n = 171) or matching placebo (n = 92).

Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was absence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms at day 14. There were 23 secondary clinical end points, including all-cause hospitalization at day 21.

Results: Among 263 participants who were randomized (median age, 43 years; 174 [66\%] women; 57\% non-Hispanic White and 29\% Latinx/Hispanic), 76\% completed the trial. The trial was terminated by the data and safety monitoring committee for futility after the interim analysis. At day 14, there was no significant difference in proportion of participants who were symptom free (azithromycin: 50\%; placebo: 50\%; prevalence difference, 0\%; 95\% CI, -14\% to 15\%; P \> .99). Of 23 prespecified secondary clinical end points, 18 showed no significant difference. By day 21, 5 participants in the azithromycin group had been hospitalized compared with 0 in the placebo group (prevalence difference, 4\%; 95\% CI, -1\% to 9\%; P = .16).

Conclusions and Relevance: Among outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, treatment with a single dose of azithromycin compared with placebo did not result in greater likelihood of being symptom free at day 14. These findings do not support the routine use of azithromycin for outpatient SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04332107.

}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2021.11517}, author = {Oldenburg, Catherine E and Pinsky, Benjamin A and Brogdon, Jessica and Chen, Cindi and Ruder, Kevin and Zhong, Lina and Nyatigo, Fanice and Cook, Catherine A and Hinterwirth, Armin and Lebas, Elodie and Redd, Travis and Porco, Travis C and Lietman, Thomas M and Arnold, Benjamin F and Doan, Thuy} }