@article {901, title = {Impact of Sample Collection Order on the Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Deep Sequencing for Infectious Keratitis.}, journal = {Cornea}, volume = {41}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Jan 01}, pages = {39-44}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the impact of sample collection order on the diagnostic yield of metagenomic deep sequencing (MDS) for determining the causative pathogen in infectious keratitis.

METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional diagnostic test evaluation among subjects with infectious keratitis at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India. All subjects underwent corneal scrapings of the affected eye to obtain potassium hydroxide smear, Gram stain, bacterial culture, and fungal culture, in this order. The order of MDS specimen collection relative to smear and culture samples was randomized and served as the primary predictor. Outcomes included the normalized copy number of pathogenic RNA detected by MDS, the proportion of MDS samples that were diagnostic, and the agreement of MDS results with cultures.

RESULTS: MDS samples from 46 subjects with corneal ulcers were evaluated. MDS was positive in 33 subjects (76\%) and had 74\% overall agreement with culture results. There was no association between order of MDS sample collection and normalized copy number of genetic material detected (P = 0.62) or the likelihood of MDS positivity (P = 0.46). However, the likelihood of agreement between MDS and cultures decreased when MDS corneal swabs were collected after other diagnostic corneal scrapings (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: The overall yield of MDS for detecting the cause of infectious keratitis was not affected by sample collection order. However, diagnostic agreement between MDS and cultures decreased when MDS samples were collected after other specimens. Additional investigation is warranted to determine whether this represents increased sensitivity of MDS compared with cultures or higher susceptibility to contaminants.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bacteria, Cornea, Cross-Sectional Studies, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Fungal, Eye Infections, Bacterial, Eye Infections, Fungal, Female, Fungi, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Keratitis, Male, Metagenome, Middle Aged, Specimen Handling, Young Adult}, issn = {1536-4798}, doi = {10.1097/ICO.0000000000002766}, author = {Redd, Travis K and Lalitha, Prajna and Prajna, N Venkatesh and Sikha, Misra and Gunasekaran, Rameshkumar and Hinterwirth, Armin and Chen, Cindi and Zhong, Lina and Liu, Zijun and Lietman, Thomas M and Keenan, Jeremy D and Doan, Thuy and Seitzman, Gerami D} } @article {61, title = {Infectious corneal ulceration: a proposal for neglected tropical disease status.}, journal = {Bull World Health Organ}, volume = {97}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Dec 01}, pages = {854-856}, keywords = {Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Infections, Corneal Ulcer, Developing Countries, Global Health, Health Promotion, Humans, Leprosy, Neglected Diseases, Onchocerciasis, Ocular, Trachoma}, issn = {1564-0604}, doi = {10.2471/BLT.19.232660}, author = {Ung, Lawson and Acharya, Nisha R and Agarwal, Tushar and Alfonso, Eduardo C and Bagga, Bhupesh and Bispo, Paulo Jm and Burton, Matthew J and Dart, John Kg and Doan, Thuy and Fleiszig, Suzanne Mj and Garg, Prashant and Gilmore, Michael S and Gritz, David C and Hazlett, Linda D and Iovieno, Alfonso and Jhanji, Vishal and Kempen, John H and Lee, Cecilia S and Lietman, Thomas M and Margolis, Todd P and McLeod, Stephen D and Mehta, Jod S and Miller, Darlene and Pearlman, Eric and Prajna, Lalitha and Prajna, N Venkatesh and Seitzman, Gerami D and Shanbhag, Swapna S and Sharma, Namrata and Sharma, Savitri and Srinivasan, Muthiah and Stapleton, Fiona and Tan, Donald Th and Tandon, Radhika and Taylor, Hugh R and Tu, Elmer Y and Tuli, Sonal S and Vajpayee, Rasik B and Van Gelder, Russell N and Watson, Stephanie L and Zegans, Michael E and Chodosh, James} }