@article {41, title = {Effect of Corticosteroid-Sparing Treatment With Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Methotrexate on Inflammation in Patients With Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.}, journal = {JAMA}, volume = {322}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 09 10}, pages = {936-945}, abstract = {

Importance: Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are commonly used immunomodulatory therapies for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious uveitis, but there is uncertainty about which drug is more effective.

Objective: To compare the effect of methotrexate and mycophenolate for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis.

Design, Setting, and Participants: The First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial screened 265 adults with noninfectious uveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy from 9 referral eye centers in India, the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and Mexico between August 22, 2013, and August 16, 2017. Follow-up ended on August 20, 2018.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive oral methotrexate, 25 mg weekly (n = 107), or oral mycophenolate mofetil, 3 g daily (n = 109).

Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was treatment success at 6 months, which was defined as having control of inflammation in both eyes, no more than 7.5 mg prednisone daily and less than or equal to 2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1\%, and no treatment failure due to safety or intolerability. Patients underwent follow-up to 12 months while receiving the same treatment or switched to the other antimetabolite, depending on their 6-month outcome.

Results: Among 216 patients who were randomized (median age, 38 years; 135 (62.5\%) women), 194 (89.8\%) completed follow-up through 6 months. Treatment success occurred in 64 (66.7\%) patients in the methotrexate group vs 56 (57.1\%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 9.5\% [95\% CI, -5.3\% to 21.8\%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.50 [95\% CI, 0.81 to 2.81]; P = .20). Among patients with posterior uveitis or panuveitis, treatment success was achieved in 58 (74.4\%) in the methotrexate group vs 42 (55.3\%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 19.1\% [95\% CI, 3.6\% to 30.6\%]; OR, 2.35 [95\% CI, 1.16 to 4.90]; P = .02); whereas among patients with intermediate uveitis treatment success occurred in 6 (33.3\%) in the methotrexate group vs 14 (63.6\%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, -30.3\% [95\% CI, -51.6\% to 1.1\%]; OR, 0.29 [95\% CI, 0.08 to 1.05]; P = .07; P for interaction = .004). Elevated liver enzymes were the most common nonserious laboratory adverse event, occurring in 14 patients (13.0\%) in the methotrexate group and 8 patients (7.4\%) in the mycophenolate group.

Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with noninfectious uveitis, the use of mycophenolate mofetil compared with methotrexate as first-line corticosteroid-sparing treatment did not result in superior control of inflammation. Further research is needed to determine if either drug is more effective based on the anatomical subtype of uveitis.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01829295.

}, keywords = {Adult, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Drug Therapy, Combination, Enzyme Inhibitors, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Liver Function Tests, Male, Methotrexate, Middle Aged, Mycophenolic Acid, Prednisolone, Uveitis}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2019.12618}, author = {Rathinam, S R and Gonzales, John A and Thundikandy, Radhika and Kanakath, Anuradha and Murugan, S Bala and Vedhanayaki, R and Lim, Lyndell L and Suhler, Eric B and Al-Dhibi, Hassan A and Doan, Thuy and Keenan, Jeremy D and Rao, Maya M and Ebert, Caleb D and Nguyen, Hieu H and Kim, Eric and Porco, Travis C and Acharya, Nisha R} } @article {116, title = {Time Trade-off Utility Values in Noninfectious~Uveitis.}, journal = {Am J Ophthalmol}, volume = {208}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 12}, pages = {47-55}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: To investigate time trade-off (TTO) utility values in patients with noninfectious uveitis and determine whether patient demographics and clinical characteristics are associated with utility scores.

DESIGN: Time trade-off utility analysis.

METHODS: Setting: A tertiary care uveitis center in San Francisco, California, USA.

PATIENT POPULATION: One hundred and four consecutive adults with noninfectious uveitis, enrolled between November 2016 and February 2017.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: TTO utility values, as collected by an interviewer-guided survey. Information regarding general health, ocular symptoms, and religion was also collected and medical record review was conducted to record anatomic location of uveitis, disease activity, visual acuity, and treatments. Multivariable regression analysis with backward selection was used to identify variables associated with TTO values.

RESULTS: Median TTO score was 0.975 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.8-1.0), corresponding to trading a median 1.28 years of remaining life for healthy eyes (IQR: 0-6.29). Regression analysis revealed that worse eye visual acuity, \>6\ months of oral corticosteroid use, and current antidepressant use were associated with lower TTO scores (P\ = .008, P\ = .006, P\ = .008, respectively), controlling for age and sex. In particular, patients who had been taking oral corticosteroids for more than 6\ months, regardless of dose, were 10.5 times more likely to trade 20\% or more years of remaining life (TTO <=0.8) than patients not taking oral corticosteroids (95\% confidence interval: 2.3, 48.1; P\ = .002).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with noninfectious uveitis had measurable, though modest, reductions in quality of life, as assessed by TTO, and these decreases were significantly associated with visual acuity in the worse eye and long-term oral corticosteroid use.

}, keywords = {Administration, Oral, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Glucocorticoids, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Sickness Impact Profile, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tertiary Care Centers, Uveitis, Visual Acuity}, issn = {1879-1891}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.005}, author = {Niemeyer, Katherine M and Gonzales, John A and Doan, Thuy and Browne, Erica N and Rao, Maya M and Acharya, Nisha R} }