@article {1586, title = {Association Between Baseline Macular Morphologic Features on Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Outcomes in Patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease.}, journal = {Ocul Immunol Inflamm}, volume = {33}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Feb}, pages = {263-270}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: The choroidal thickening and serous retinal detachments that characterize Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease can be imaged in detail using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Whether specific qualitative and quantitative SD-OCT features at presentation were associated with visual outcomes in a randomized controlled trial comparing methotrexate to mycophenolate for steroid-sparing control of uveitis were evaluated.

METHODS: An exploratory subanalysis of data from the FAST trial in which SD-OCT images from VKH participants were analyzed for presence/absence of bacillary detachments, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) folds, and internal limiting membrane (ILM) fluctuations was performed. A modified RPE undulation index was calculated to provide a quantifiable surrogate marker for choroidal folds.

RESULTS: SD-OCT images were available from 158 eyes with VKH. At baseline, bacillary detachments were present in 23.5\% of eyes, RPE folds in 22.8\% of eyes, and ILM fluctuations in 35.2\% of eyes. For each 0.1 unit increase in modified RPE undulation index, there was an associated 0.13 increase in mean logMAR BSCVA at baseline. None of the SD-OCT features were associated with BSCVA at the 6-month primary endpoint. Indeed, mean final BSCVA was similar in those with and without the SD-OCT features of interest at baseline, and was between 0.1 and 0.2 logMAR (Snellen visual acuity 20/25 to 20/30).

CONCLUSIONS: While eyes with VKH may present with a variety of SD-OCT imaging pathology prior to starting immunosuppression with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil, final visual outcome in our study was excellent. With appropriate immunosuppression, good visual outcomes are possible in VKH.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01829295Date of Registration: April 11, 2013.

}, keywords = {Adult, Female, Fluorescein Angiography, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Macula Lutea, Male, Methotrexate, Middle Aged, Mycophenolic Acid, Retinal Detachment, Retinal Pigment Epithelium, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome, Visual Acuity}, issn = {1744-5078}, doi = {10.1080/09273948.2024.2391420}, author = {Sundararajan, Miel and Rathinam, Sivakumar R and Thundikandy, Radhika and Kanakath, Anuradha and Balamurugan, S and Vedhanayaki, R and Miller, D Claire and Lim, Lyndell L and Suhler, Eric B and Al-Dhibi, Hassan A and Arellanes-Garcia, Lourdes and Reddy, Amit K and Feng, Shu and Doan, Thuy and Porco, Travis C and Shantha, Jessica G and Acharya, Nisha R and Gonzales, John A} } @article {1381, title = {Prolonged mass azithromycin distributions and macrolide resistance determinants among preschool children in Niger: A sub-study of a cluster-randomized trial (MORDOR).}, journal = {PLoS Med}, volume = {21}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 May}, pages = {e1004386}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials found that twice-yearly mass azithromycin administration (MDA) reduces childhood mortality, presumably by reducing infection burden. World Health Organization (WHO) issued conditional guidelines for mass azithromycin administration in high-mortality settings in sub-Saharan Africa given concerns for antibiotic resistance. While prolonged twice-yearly MDA has been shown to increase antibiotic resistance in small randomized controlled trials, the objective of this study was to determine if macrolide and non-macrolide resistance in the gut increases with the duration of azithromycin MDA in a larger setting.

METHODS AND FINDINGS: The Macrolide Oraux pour R{\'e}duire les D{\'e}c{\`e}s avec un Oeil sur la R{\'e}sistance (MORDOR) study was conducted in Niger from December 2014 to June 2020. It was a cluster-randomized trial of azithromycin (A) versus placebo (P) aimed at evaluating childhood mortality. This is a sub-study in the MORDOR trial to track changes in antibiotic resistance after prolonged azithromycin MDA. A total of 594 communities were eligible. Children 1 to 59 months in 163 randomly chosen communities were eligible to receive treatment and included in resistance monitoring. Participants, staff, and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. At the conclusion of MORDOR Phase I, by design, all communities received an additional year of twice-yearly azithromycin treatments (Phase II). Thus, at the conclusion of Phase II, the treatment history (1 letter per 6-month period) for the participating communities was either (PP-PP-AA) or (AA-AA-AA). In Phase III, participating communities were then re-randomized to receive either another 3 rounds of azithromycin or placebo, thus resulting in 4 treatment histories: Group 1 (AA-AA-AA-AA-A, N = 51), Group 2 (PP-PP-AA-AA-A, N = 40), Group 3 (AA-AA-AA-PP-P, N = 27), and Group 4 (PP-PP-AA-PP-P, N = 32). Rectal swabs from each child (N = 5,340) were obtained 6 months after the last treatment. Each child contributed 1 rectal swab and these were pooled at the community level, processed for DNA-seq, and analyzed for genetic resistance determinants. The primary prespecified outcome was macrolide resistance determinants in the gut. Secondary outcomes were resistance to beta-lactams and other antibiotic classes. Communities recently randomized to azithromycin (groups 1 and 2) had significantly more macrolide resistance determinants than those recently randomized to placebo (groups 3 and 4) (fold change 2.18, 95\% CI 1.5 to 3.51, Punadj \< 0.001). However, there was no significant increase in macrolide resistance in communities treated 4.5 years (group 1) compared to just the most recent 2.5 years (group 2) (fold change 0.80, 95\% CI 0.50 to 1.00, Padj = 0.010), or between communities that had been treated for 3 years in the past (group 3) versus just 1 year in the past (group 4) (fold change 1.00, 95\% CI 0.78 to 2.35, Padj = 0.52). We also found no significant differences for beta-lactams or other antibiotic classes. The main limitations of our study were the absence of phenotypic characterization of resistance, no complete placebo arm, and no monitoring outside of Niger limiting generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that mass azithromycin distribution for childhood mortality among preschool children in Niger increased macrolide resistance determinants in the gut but that resistance may plateau after 2 to 3 years of treatment. Co-selection to other classes needs to be monitored.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02047981 https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02047981.

}, keywords = {Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Child Mortality, Child, Preschool, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Female, Humans, Infant, Macrolides, Male, Mass Drug Administration, Niger}, issn = {1549-1676}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pmed.1004386}, author = {Arzika, Ahmed M and Abdou, Amza and Maliki, Ramatou and Beido, Nassirou and Kadri, Boubacar and Harouna, Abdoul N and Galo, Abdoul N and Alio, Mankara K and Lebas, Elodie and Oldenburg, Catherine E and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Kieran S and Chen, Cindi and Zhong, Lina and Zhou, Zhaoxia and Yan, Daisy and Hinterwirth, Armin and Keenan, Jeremy D and Porco, Travis C and Lietman, Thomas M and Doan, Thuy} } @article {911, title = {Age-based targeting of biannual azithromycin distribution for child survival in Niger: an adaptive cluster-randomized trial protocol (AVENIR).}, journal = {BMC Public Health}, volume = {21}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 04 29}, pages = {822}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Biannual distribution of azithromycin to children 1-59 months old reduced mortality by 14\% in a cluster-randomized trial. The World Health Organization has proposed targeting this intervention to the subgroup of children 1-11 months old to reduce selection for antimicrobial resistance. Here, we describe a trial designed to determine the impact of age-based targeting of biannual azithromycin on mortality and antimicrobial resistance.

METHODS: AVENIR is a cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, response-adaptive large simple trial in Niger. During the 2.5-year study period, 3350 communities are targeted for enrollment. In the first year, communities in the Dosso region will be randomized 1:1:1 to 1) azithromycin 1-11: biannual azithromycin to children 1-11 months old with placebo to children 12-59 months old, 2) azithromycin 1-59: biannual azithromycin to children 1-59 months old, or 3) placebo: biannual placebo to children 1-59 months old. Regions enrolled after the first year will be randomized with an updated allocation based on the probability of mortality in children 1-59 months in each arm during the preceding study period. A biannual door-to-door census will be conducted to enumerate the population, distribute azithromycin and placebo, and monitor vital status. Primary mortality outcomes are defined as all-cause mortality rate (deaths per 1000 person-years) after 2.5 years from the first enrollment in 1) children 1-59 months old comparing the azithromycin 1-59 and placebo arms, 2) children 1-11 months old comparing the azithromycin 1-11 and placebo arm, and 3) children 12-59 months in the azithromycin 1-11 and azithromycin 1-59 arms. In the Dosso region, 50 communities from each arm will be followed to monitor antimicrobial resistance. Primary resistance outcomes will be assessed after 2 years of distributions and include 1) prevalence of genetic determinants of macrolide resistance in nasopharyngeal samples from children 1-59 months old, and 2) load of genetic determinants of macrolide resistance in rectal samples from children 1-59 months old.

DISCUSSION: As high-mortality settings consider this intervention, the results of this trial will provide evidence to support programmatic and policy decision-making on age-based strategies for azithromycin distribution to promote child survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on January 13, 2020 (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04224987 ).

}, keywords = {Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Child, Child, Preschool, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Humans, Infant, Macrolides, Mass Drug Administration, Niger, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic}, issn = {1471-2458}, doi = {10.1186/s12889-021-10824-7}, author = {O{\textquoteright}Brien, Kieran S and Arzika, Ahmed M and Amza, Abdou and Maliki, Ramatou and Ousmane, Sani and Kadri, Boubacar and Nassirou, Beido and Mankara, Alio Karamba and Harouna, Abdoul Naser and Colby, Emily and Lebas, Elodie and Liu, Zijun and Le, Victoria and Nguyen, William and Keenan, Jeremy D and Oldenburg, Catherine E and Porco, Travis C and Doan, Thuy and Arnold, Benjamin F and Lietman, Thomas M} } @article {71, title = {Macrolide and Nonmacrolide Resistance with Mass Azithromycin Distribution.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {383}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 11 12}, pages = {1941-1950}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Mass distribution of azithromycin to preschool children twice yearly for 2 years has been shown to reduce childhood mortality in sub-Saharan Africa but at the cost of amplifying macrolide resistance. The effects on the gut resistome, a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance genes in the body, of twice-yearly administration of azithromycin for a longer period are unclear.

METHODS: We investigated the gut resistome of children after they received twice-yearly distributions of azithromycin for 4 years. In the Niger site of the MORDOR trial, we enrolled 30 villages in a concurrent trial in which they were randomly assigned to receive mass distribution of either azithromycin or placebo, offered to all children 1 to 59 months of age every 6 months for 4 years. Rectal swabs were collected at baseline, 36 months, and 48 months for analysis of the participants{\textquoteright} gut resistome. The primary outcome was the ratio of macrolide-resistance determinants in the azithromycin group to those in the placebo group at 48 months.

RESULTS: Over the entire 48-month period, the mean ({\textpm}SD) coverage was 86.6{\textpm}12\% in the villages that received placebo and 83.2{\textpm}16.4\% in the villages that received azithromycin. A total of 3232 samples were collected during the entire trial period; of the samples obtained at the 48-month monitoring visit, 546 samples from 15 villages that received placebo and 504 from 14 villages that received azithromycin were analyzed. Determinants of macrolide resistance were higher in the azithromycin group than in the placebo group: 7.4 times as high (95\% confidence interval [CI], 4.0 to 16.7) at 36 months and 7.5 times as high (95\% CI, 3.8 to 23.1) at 48 months. Continued mass azithromycin distributions also selected for determinants of nonmacrolide resistance, including resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, an antibiotic class prescribed frequently in this region of Africa.

CONCLUSIONS: Among villages assigned to receive mass distributions of azithromycin or placebo twice yearly for 4 years, antibiotic resistance was more common in the villages that received azithromycin than in those that received placebo. This trial showed that mass azithromycin distributions may propagate antibiotic resistance. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02047981.).

}, keywords = {Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Child Mortality, Child, Preschool, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Female, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Humans, Infant, Macrolides, Male, Mass Drug Administration, Metagenome, Niger, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMoa2002606}, author = {Doan, Thuy and Worden, Lee and Hinterwirth, Armin and Arzika, Ahmed M and Maliki, Ramatou and Abdou, Amza and Zhong, Lina and Chen, Cindi and Cook, Catherine and Lebas, Elodie and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Kieran S and Oldenburg, Catherine E and Chow, Eric D and Porco, Travis C and Lipsitch, Marc and Keenan, Jeremy D and Lietman, Thomas M} } @article {86, title = {Post-antibiotic Ocular Surface Microbiome in Children: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.}, journal = {Ophthalmology}, volume = {127}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 08}, pages = {1127-1130}, keywords = {Anti-Bacterial Agents, Child, Cornea, Humans, Microbiota, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic}, issn = {1549-4713}, doi = {10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.014}, author = {Doan, Thuy and Hinterwirth, Armin and Worden, Lee and Arzika, Ahmed M and Maliki, Ramatou and Chen, Cindi and Zhong, Lina and Zhou, Zhaoxia and Acharya, Nisha R and Porco, Travis C and Keenan, Jeremy D and Lietman, Thomas M} } @article {76, title = {A double masked randomised 4-week, placebo-controlled study in the USA, Thailand and Taiwan to compare the efficacy of oral valganciclovir and topical 2\% ganciclovir in the treatment of cytomegalovirus anterior uveitis: study protocol.}, journal = {BMJ Open}, volume = {9}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 12 19}, pages = {e033175}, abstract = {

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior uveitis is a recognised cause of anterior uveitis in immunocompetent patients and is preventable cause of vision loss. Ocular sequelae include corneal endothelial damage which can cause corneal oedema and failure, as well as glaucoma. Recurrences of inflammation are common and therefore patients are often exposed to long-term therapy. Oral therapy is available in the form of valganciclovir, although with the caveat of systemic side effects such as bone marrow suppression and renal failure necessitating regular interval laboratory monitoring. Recent reports have demonstrated that topical 2\% ganciclovir solution may offer promising treatment outcomes in patients with CMV anterior uveitis with superior safety, cost-effectiveness and convenience profiles. An investigation into the relative equipoise of these therapies is warranted for these reasons.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Systemic and Topical Control of Cytomegalovirus Anterior uveitis: Treatment Outcomes (STACCATO) trial is designed as a multicentre, block randomised by site, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing the efficacy of oral valganciclovir, 2\% topical ganciclovir and placebo in treating PCR-proven CMV anterior uveitis. Participant clinical evaluation will occur at three study time points by a masked study ophthalmologist over a 28-day period to assess resolution of ocular inflammation (secondary outcome). A control group will provide additional information about the possible impact that the infected host{\textquoteright}s immune response may play in controlling local viral replication. The primary analysis is an analysis of covariance (three arms) correcting for baseline to compare quantitative CMV viral load in the anterior chamber (AC) aqueous fluid before and 7 days after treatment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of California San Francisco Committee on Human Research and the Khon Kaen University Institutional Review Board have given ethical approval. The results of this trial will be presented at local and international meetings and submitted for peer-reviewed journals for publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03576898.

}, keywords = {Administration, Oral, Administration, Topical, Antiviral Agents, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Double-Blind Method, Ganciclovir, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Taiwan, Thailand, United States, Uveitis, Anterior, Valganciclovir, Viral Load}, issn = {2044-6055}, doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033175}, author = {Takhar, Jaskirat S and Joye, Ashlin S and Somkijrungroj, Thanapong and Laovirojjanakul, Wipada and Lin, Chang-Ping and Lietman, Thomas M and Porco, Travis C and Keenan, Jeremy D and Gebreegziabher, Elisabeth A and Seitzman, Gerami D and Rose-Nussbaumer, Jennifer and Thuy A Doan and Acharya, Nisha R and Gonzales, John A} } @article {231, title = {A double-masked placebo-controlled trial of azithromycin to prevent child mortality in Burkina Faso, West Africa: Community Health with Azithromycin Trial (CHAT) study protocol.}, journal = {Trials}, volume = {20}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Dec 04}, pages = {675}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Biannual, mass azithromycin distribution has previously been shown to reduce all-cause child mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Subgroup analysis suggested that the strongest effects were in the youngest children, leading to the hypothesis that targeting younger age groups might be an effective strategy to prevent mortality. We present the methods of two randomized controlled trials designed to evaluate mass and targeted azithromycin distribution for the prevention of child mortality in Burkina Faso, West Africa.

METHODS/DESIGN: The Child Health with Azithromycin Treatment (CHAT) study consists of two nested, randomized controlled trials. In the first, communities are randomized in a 1:1 fashion to biannual, mass azithromycin distribution or placebo. The primary outcome is under-5 all-cause mortality measured at the community level. In the second, children attending primary healthcare facilities during the first 5-12 weeks of life for a healthy child visit (e.g., for vaccination) are randomized in a 1:1 fashion to a single orally administered dose of azithromycin or placebo. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality measured at 6 months of age. The trial commenced enrollment in August 2019.

DISCUSSION: This study is expected to provide evidence on two health systems delivery approaches (mass and targeted treatment) for azithromycin to prevent all-cause child mortality. The results will inform global and national policies related to azithromycin for the prevention of child mortality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03676764. Registered on 19 September 2018; prospectively registered pre results.

}, keywords = {Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Child Mortality, Child, Preschool, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Infant, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sample Size}, issn = {1745-6215}, doi = {10.1186/s13063-019-3855-9}, author = {Sie, Ali and Ouattara, Mamadou and Bountogo, Mamadou and Bagagnan, Cheik and Coulibaly, Boubacar and Boudo, Valentin and Lebas, Elodie and Brogdon, Jessica M and Lin, Ying and B{\"a}rnighausen, Till and Porco, Travis C and Doan, Thuy and Lietman, Thomas M and Oldenburg, Catherine E} } @article {41, title = {Effect of Corticosteroid-Sparing Treatment With Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Methotrexate on Inflammation in Patients With Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.}, journal = {JAMA}, volume = {322}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 09 10}, pages = {936-945}, abstract = {

Importance: Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are commonly used immunomodulatory therapies for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious uveitis, but there is uncertainty about which drug is more effective.

Objective: To compare the effect of methotrexate and mycophenolate for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis.

Design, Setting, and Participants: The First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial screened 265 adults with noninfectious uveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy from 9 referral eye centers in India, the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and Mexico between August 22, 2013, and August 16, 2017. Follow-up ended on August 20, 2018.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive oral methotrexate, 25 mg weekly (n = 107), or oral mycophenolate mofetil, 3 g daily (n = 109).

Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was treatment success at 6 months, which was defined as having control of inflammation in both eyes, no more than 7.5 mg prednisone daily and less than or equal to 2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1\%, and no treatment failure due to safety or intolerability. Patients underwent follow-up to 12 months while receiving the same treatment or switched to the other antimetabolite, depending on their 6-month outcome.

Results: Among 216 patients who were randomized (median age, 38 years; 135 (62.5\%) women), 194 (89.8\%) completed follow-up through 6 months. Treatment success occurred in 64 (66.7\%) patients in the methotrexate group vs 56 (57.1\%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 9.5\% [95\% CI, -5.3\% to 21.8\%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.50 [95\% CI, 0.81 to 2.81]; P = .20). Among patients with posterior uveitis or panuveitis, treatment success was achieved in 58 (74.4\%) in the methotrexate group vs 42 (55.3\%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 19.1\% [95\% CI, 3.6\% to 30.6\%]; OR, 2.35 [95\% CI, 1.16 to 4.90]; P = .02); whereas among patients with intermediate uveitis treatment success occurred in 6 (33.3\%) in the methotrexate group vs 14 (63.6\%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, -30.3\% [95\% CI, -51.6\% to 1.1\%]; OR, 0.29 [95\% CI, 0.08 to 1.05]; P = .07; P for interaction = .004). Elevated liver enzymes were the most common nonserious laboratory adverse event, occurring in 14 patients (13.0\%) in the methotrexate group and 8 patients (7.4\%) in the mycophenolate group.

Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with noninfectious uveitis, the use of mycophenolate mofetil compared with methotrexate as first-line corticosteroid-sparing treatment did not result in superior control of inflammation. Further research is needed to determine if either drug is more effective based on the anatomical subtype of uveitis.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01829295.

}, keywords = {Adult, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Drug Therapy, Combination, Enzyme Inhibitors, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Liver Function Tests, Male, Methotrexate, Middle Aged, Mycophenolic Acid, Prednisolone, Uveitis}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2019.12618}, author = {Rathinam, S R and Gonzales, John A and Thundikandy, Radhika and Kanakath, Anuradha and Murugan, S Bala and Vedhanayaki, R and Lim, Lyndell L and Suhler, Eric B and Al-Dhibi, Hassan A and Doan, Thuy and Keenan, Jeremy D and Rao, Maya M and Ebert, Caleb D and Nguyen, Hieu H and Kim, Eric and Porco, Travis C and Acharya, Nisha R} } @article {151, title = {High-throughput sequencing of pooled samples to determine community-level microbiome diversity.}, journal = {Ann Epidemiol}, volume = {39}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 11}, pages = {63-68}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Community-level interventions in cluster randomized controlled trials may alter the gut microbiome of individuals. The current method of estimating community diversities uses microbiome data obtained from multiple individual{\textquoteright}s specimens. Here we propose randomly pooling a number of microbiome samples from the same community into one sample before sequencing to estimate community-level microbiome diversity.

METHODS: We design and analyze an experiment to compare community microbiome diversity (gamma-diversity) estimates derived from 16S rRNA gene sequencing of 1) individually sequenced specimens vs. 2) pooled specimens collected from a community. Pool sizes of 10, 20, and 40 are considered. We then compare the gamma-estimates using Pearson{\textquoteright}s correlation as well as using Bland and Altman agreement analysis for three established diversity indices including richness, Simpson{\textquoteright}s and Shannon{\textquoteright}s.

RESULTS: The gamma-diversity estimates are highly correlated, with most being statistically significant. All correlations between all three diversity estimates are significant in the 10-pooled data. Pools comprising 40 specimens are closest to the line of agreement, but all pooled samples and individual samples fall within the 95\% limits of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS: Pooling microbiome samples before DNA amplification and metagenomics sequencing to estimate community-level diversity is a viable measure to consider in population-level association research studies.

}, keywords = {Administration, Oral, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Bacteria, Biodiversity, Child, Preschool, Female, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Gastrointestinal Tract, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Metagenomics, Microbiota, Niger, Placebos, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1873-2585}, doi = {10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.09.002}, author = {Ray, Kathryn J and Cotter, Sun Y and Arzika, Ahmed M and Kim, Jessica and Boubacar, Nameywa and Zhou, Zhaoxia and Zhong, Lina and Porco, Travis C and Keenan, Jeremy D and Lietman, Thomas M and Doan, Thuy} } @article {121, title = {Longer-Term Assessment of Azithromycin for Reducing Childhood Mortality in Africa.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {380}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Jun 06}, pages = {2207-2214}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The MORDOR I trial (Macrolides Oraux pour R{\'e}duire les D{\'e}c{\`e}s avec un Oeil sur la R{\'e}sistance) showed that in Niger, mass administration of azithromycin twice a year for 2 years resulted in 18\% lower postneonatal childhood mortality than administration of placebo. Whether this benefit could increase with each administration or wane owing to antibiotic resistance was unknown.

METHODS: In the Niger component of the MORDOR I trial, we randomly assigned 594 communities to four twice-yearly distributions of either azithromycin or placebo to children 1 to 59 months of age. In MORDOR II, all these communities received two additional open-label azithromycin distributions. All-cause mortality was assessed twice yearly by census workers who were unaware of participants{\textquoteright} original assignments.

RESULTS: In the MORDOR II trial, the mean ({\textpm}SD) azithromycin coverage was 91.3{\textpm}7.2\% in the communities that received twice-yearly azithromycin for the first time (i.e., had received placebo for 2 years in MORDOR I) and 92.0{\textpm}6.6\% in communities that received azithromycin for the third year (i.e., had received azithromycin for 2 years in MORDOR I). In MORDOR II, mortality was 24.0 per 1000 person-years (95\% confidence interval [CI], 22.1 to 26.3) in communities that had originally received placebo in the first year and 23.3 per 1000 person-years (95\% CI, 21.4 to 25.5) in those that had originally received azithromycin in the first year, with no significant difference between groups (P = 0.55). In communities that had originally received placebo, mortality decreased by 13.3\% (95\% CI, 5.8 to 20.2) when the communities received azithromycin (P = 0.007). In communities that had originally received azithromycin and continued receiving it for an additional year, the difference in mortality between the third year and the first 2 years was not significant (-3.6\%; 95\% CI, -12.3 to 4.5; P = 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that the effect of mass administration of azithromycin on childhood mortality in Niger waned in the third year of treatment. Childhood mortality decreased when communities that had originally received placebo received azithromycin. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02047981.).

}, keywords = {Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Child Mortality, Child, Preschool, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Male, Mass Drug Administration, Niger}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMoa1817213}, author = {Keenan, Jeremy D and Arzika, Ahmed M and Maliki, Ramatou and Boubacar, Nameywa and Elh Adamou, Sanoussi and Moussa Ali, Maria and Cook, Catherine and Lebas, Elodie and Lin, Ying and Ray, Kathryn J and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Kieran S and Doan, Thuy and Oldenburg, Catherine E and Callahan, E Kelly and Emerson, Paul M and Porco, Travis C and Lietman, Thomas M} } @article {136, title = {Macrolide Resistance in MORDOR I - A Cluster-Randomized Trial in Niger.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {380}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Jun 06}, pages = {2271-2273}, keywords = {Administration, Oral, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Child, Preschool, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Humans, Infant, Macrolides, Niger, Pneumococcal Infections, Streptococcus pneumoniae}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMc1901535}, author = {Doan, Thuy and Arzika, Ahmed M and Hinterwirth, Armin and Maliki, Ramatou and Zhong, Lina and Cummings, Susie and Sarkar, Samarpita and Chen, Cindi and Porco, Travis C and Keenan, Jeremy D and Lietman, Thomas M} } @article {56, title = {Azithromycin to Reduce Childhood Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {378}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Apr 26}, pages = {1583-1592}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that mass distribution of a broad-spectrum antibiotic agent to preschool children would reduce mortality in areas of sub-Saharan Africa that are currently far from meeting the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations.

METHODS: In this cluster-randomized trial, we assigned communities in Malawi, Niger, and Tanzania to four twice-yearly mass distributions of either oral azithromycin (approximately 20 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo. Children 1 to 59 months of age were identified in twice-yearly censuses and were offered participation in the trial. Vital status was determined at subsequent censuses. The primary outcome was aggregate all-cause mortality; country-specific rates were assessed in prespecified subgroup analyses.

RESULTS: A total of 1533 communities underwent randomization, 190,238 children were identified in the census at baseline, and 323,302 person-years were monitored. The mean ({\textpm}SD) azithromycin and placebo coverage over the four twice-yearly distributions was 90.4{\textpm}10.4\%. The overall annual mortality rate was 14.6 deaths per 1000 person-years in communities that received azithromycin (9.1 in Malawi, 22.5 in Niger, and 5.4 in Tanzania) and 16.5 deaths per 1000 person-years in communities that received placebo (9.6 in Malawi, 27.5 in Niger, and 5.5 in Tanzania). Mortality was 13.5\% lower overall (95\% confidence interval [CI], 6.7 to 19.8) in communities that received azithromycin than in communities that received placebo (P\<0.001); the rate was 5.7\% lower in Malawi (95\% CI, -9.7 to 18.9), 18.1\% lower in Niger (95\% CI, 10.0 to 25.5), and 3.4\% lower in Tanzania (95\% CI, -21.2 to 23.0). Children in the age group of 1 to 5 months had the greatest effect from azithromycin (24.9\% lower mortality than that with placebo; 95\% CI, 10.6 to 37.0). Serious adverse events occurring within a week after administration of the trial drug or placebo were uncommon, and the rate did not differ significantly between the groups. Evaluation of selection for antibiotic resistance is ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS: Among postneonatal, preschool children in sub-Saharan Africa, childhood mortality was lower in communities randomly assigned to mass distribution of azithromycin than in those assigned to placebo, with the largest effect seen in Niger. Any implementation of a policy of mass distribution would need to strongly consider the potential effect of such a strategy on antibiotic resistance. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; MORDOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02047981 .).

}, keywords = {Administration, Oral, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Child Mortality, Child, Preschool, Communicable Disease Control, Communicable Diseases, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Malawi, Male, Mass Drug Administration, Niger, Public Health, Tanzania}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMoa1715474}, author = {Keenan, Jeremy D and Bailey, Robin L and West, Sheila K and Arzika, Ahmed M and Hart, John and Weaver, Jerusha and Kalua, Khumbo and Mrango, Zakayo and Ray, Kathryn J and Cook, Catherine and Lebas, Elodie and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Kieran S and Emerson, Paul M and Porco, Travis C and Lietman, Thomas M} } @article {276, title = {Gut Microbial Diversity in Antibiotic-Naive Children After Systemic Antibiotic Exposure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.}, journal = {Clin Infect Dis}, volume = {64}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 05 01}, pages = {1147-1153}, abstract = {

Background: Antibiotic exposure can alter the gut microbiome. We evaluate the effects of azithromycin on the gut microbiome diversity of children from an antibiotic-naive community in Niger.

Methods: A population-based sample of 80 children aged 1-60 months in the Dosso region of Niger was randomized to receive a single dose of either oral azithromycin or placebo. Fecal samples were collected immediately before treatment and 5 days after treatment for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The prespecified outcome was α-diversity (inverse Simpson{\textquoteright}s α-diversity index), with secondary outcomes of β and γ Simpson{\textquoteright}s and Shannon{\textquoteright}s diversities.

Results: At 5 days after treatment, 40 children aged 1-60 months were analyzed in the azithromycin-treated group and 40 children in the placebo-treated group. Diversity of the gut microbiome was significantly lower in the treated group (inverse Simpson{\textquoteright}s α-diversity, 5.03; 95\% confidence interval [CI], 4.08-6.14) than in the placebo group (6.91; 95\% CI, 5.82-8.21; P = .03). Similarly, the Shannon{\textquoteright}s α-diversity was lower in the treated group (10.60; 95\% CI, 8.82-12.36) than the placebo group (15.42; 95\% CI, 13.24-17.80; P = .004). Simpson{\textquoteright}s community-level (γ) diversity decreased with azithromycin exposure from 17.72 (95\% CI, 13.80-20.21) to 10.10 (95\% CI, 7.80-11.40; P = .00008), although β-diversity was not significantly reduced (2.56, 95\% CI, 1.88-3.12; to 2.01, 95\% CI, 1.46-2.51; P = .26).

Conclusions: Oral administration of azithromycin definitively decreases the diversity of the gut microbiome of children in an antibiotic-naive community.

Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02048007.

}, keywords = {Administration, Oral, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Bacteria, Biodiversity, Child, Preschool, Cluster Analysis, DNA, Ribosomal, Female, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Gastrointestinal Tract, Humans, Infant, Male, Niger, Phylogeny, Placebos, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1537-6591}, doi = {10.1093/cid/cix141}, author = {Doan, Thuy and Arzika, Ahmed M and Ray, Kathryn J and Cotter, Sun Y and Kim, Jessica and Maliki, Ramatou and Zhong, Lina and Zhou, Zhaoxia and Porco, Travis C and Vanderschelden, Benjamin and Keenan, Jeremy D and Lietman, Thomas M} }