Effect of Azithromycin on the Ocular Surface Microbiome of Children in a High Prevalence Trachoma Area.

Home » Publications » Effect of Azithromycin on the Ocular Surface Microbiome of Children in a High Prevalence Trachoma Area.
TitleEffect of Azithromycin on the Ocular Surface Microbiome of Children in a High Prevalence Trachoma Area.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsDoan T, Gebre T, Ayele B, Zerihun M, Hinterwirth A, Zhong L, Chen C, Ruder K, Zhou Z, Emerson PM, Porco TC, Keenan JD, Lietman TM
JournalCornea
Date Published2021 Sep 04
ISSN1536-4798
Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the 4 times per year mass azithromycin distributions on the ocular surface microbiome of children in a trachoma endemic area.

METHODS: In this cluster-randomized controlled trial, children aged 1 to 10 years in rural communities in the Goncha Seso Enesie district of Ethiopia were randomized to either no treatment or treatment with a single dose of oral azithromycin (height-based dosing to approximate 20 mg/kg) every 3 months for 1 year. Post hoc analysis of ocular surface Chlamydia trachomatis load, microbial community diversity, and macrolide resistance determinants was performed to evaluate differences between treatment arms.

RESULTS: One thousand two hundred fifty-five children from 24 communities were included in the study. The mean azithromycin coverage in the treated communities was 80% (95% CI: 73%-86%). The average age was 5 years (95% CI: 4-5). Ocular surface C. trachomatis load was reduced in children treated with the 4 times per year azithromycin (P = 0.0003). Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria lactamica, and Neisseria meningitidis were more abundant in the no-treatment arm compared with the treated arm. The macrolide resistance gene ermB was not different between arms (P = 0.63), but mefA/E was increased (P = 0.04) in the azithromycin-treated arm.

CONCLUSIONS: We found a reduction in the load of C. trachomatis and 3 Neisseria species in communities treated with azithromycin. These benefits came at the cost of selection for macrolide resistance.

DOI10.1097/ICO.0000000000002863
Alternate JournalCornea
PubMed ID34483276